Friday, May 16, 2008

all for one and one for all
Madpriest's trinity sunday sermon

God hasn’t always been a trinity. In fact he has been quite varied in the number of persons he has consisted of over the years. The main argument in the Old Testament is that he is one god, an idea that has become central to both the Jewish and the Islamic faiths. However, that isn’t the only view of the godhead in the Jewish canon. There enigmatic passages that place God in a community of gods and, more certainly, there were times in the years before Christ that Jewish people regarded some of the attributes of God, namely his spirit and his wisdom, as having personalities in their own right.

There is nothing in the synoptic gospels to indicate that Jesus saw God as anything more than a singular God the Father. He may have believed that he was literally the Son of God (although that is not definite), but being the son does not make a person his father. Also, in the synoptic gospels, the Holy Spirit is an agent that is sent from God. The Spirit is an advocate and an enabler but equality with God the Father is not propounded.

The first church, the Christian community in Jerusalem, that was led by James, the brother of Jesus, did not believe Jesus was God and the Jewish branch of Christianity, the Ebionites, clung on to this particular understanding of the nature of Christ until they disappeared around the 5th. Century A.D.

The idea of God being three persons gradually evolved around the Church in Rome. To be honest, at times at least, it was more to do with politics and the bishop of Rome trying to gain primacy over the other bishops, than it had to do with philosophy and faith. The doctrine of the Trinity became the way Rome defined itsef as orthodox over and against those it considered heretics.

This battle may have gone on for ever, but when Emperor Constantine decreed that Christianity was to be the religion of the Roman Empire, he insisted, like all good dictators, that everybody believed the same thing, and the doctrine of the Trinity very soon became the orthodox belief of most of the Christian Church.

Nowadays, the doctrine of the Holy Trinty is still very important in Church politics. For example, a church has to hold to it to become members of the World Council of Churches. And the doctrine has also become very important in modern theology as a key to understanding relationships between Christians. But my guess is that most Christians don’t think about it much. They accept that it is something they are supposed to believe in but, being human, they still see the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit as three distinct individuals and relate to them as individuals.

I have to admit that is the way it is with me. I affirm the Trinity when I recite the Creed every Sunday morning, and I’m happy to accept the mystery of it. But when I think about the three persons of the Trinity the mystery becomes the old man with a beard off the Sistine Chapel ceiling, Robert Powell and a pigeon. What can I say? I’m a human being and unable to think in paradoxes. And to be honest, if it was to be proved that our idea of the Trinity is wrong it would not effect my faith very much. I am Christian because of the words of Christ , my relationship with the Father and the help of the Holy Spirit. I am not a Christian because of theology, although I love theology dearly.

However, having said that, I do believe that there are things we can learn from the Church’s description of the Godhead that can help us as individuals and as communities of believers, live together in a more Kingdomlike manner than we tend to do. This morning I want to look at three characteristics of the Trinity that we can use as a model for our own lives.

Firstly, the Trinity is unity. It is the most perfect example of unity that exists. God is perfectly one. The paradox is that although we perceive three persons within the Trinity, God cannot be divided into parts, God is always one. God is perfection. To divide God into pieces would make him less than perfection, and so less than God, and so not God at all. God has to be one.

And what should this perfect example of unity mean to us? Well for a start it means that the Church, the bride of Christ, should always strive for unity, within itself and with God. At the moment the Church seems to be pulling itself to pieces. Every time some faction disagrees with another faction, the first thing that is threatened is that the aggrieved party is going to leave and set up their own church, their own integrity, and they are no longer in communion with anybody else because they could not possibly share the lord’s Supper with anybody who disagrees with their point of view.

Schism and threats of schism are not examples of good Trinitarian behaviour. The Trinity pulls itself into one, it brings together, it does not rend asunder. For God’s people to pull themselves apart, to pull themselves away from each is not following in Christ’s footsteps. We are all distinct people, and we remain distinct, but within the Church, each one of us, individuals that we are, should be coming together with each other to celebrate our diversity and to celebrate our unity. Such a thing is possible because we see it in the example of the Trinity, its just a lot more difficult than turning our backs on each other.

This leads to my second point. The Trinity is Community. Again the most perfect example of community. We see the three persons of the Trinity working together as one. Each person in the Trinity is an aspect of the one God, each seems to have its own function, but each function would be worthless without the functions of the others. God is perfect community, and his Church should strive to be the same. Belief is communal, it is not an individual act, you cannot be a Christian in isolation, that would be a contradiction in terms, because so much of our faith is concerned with being a community, with loving each other, with loving God, of being part of the vine of faith, with each of us offering our individual and distinctive gifts to each other and to God. Working together as the community of the Kingdom of God.

Thirdly, the Trinity is inclusive, not exclusive.The Trinity wants to involve everything within itself. The Father wants to draw the whole of creation back to himself. Jesus involves the outcast within the kingdom. The Holy Spirit involves the whole world within the chosen people of God. With this example the Church of God cannot be exclusive, we cannot refuse admission to the Church to people who embarrass us, or annoy us or who are different to us in some physical or mental way, because God is not like that. As I said, God wants to draw his people to himself, it is his people who so often choose to walk away from him, not visa versa.

Therefore, as a Church, as God’s people, we need to use the Trinity as our main model for how we behave towards each other within the Church, and how we behave towards those still outside of the Church. We must fight to avoid falling out over the things that divide and instead concentrate of the things that unite us. We should not be spreading bad news to people, we should be spreading the good news of God’s Kingdom throughout the world, and we should be doing this in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.















DOG in
three persons.

A canine
trinity.

19 comments:

Ellie Finlay said...

Great headline, Mad Priest!

And I like the sermon too!

Earthbound Spirit said...

As a non-trinitarian, let me just say that this is a much clearer explanation of the trinity than I read in any theology text over the past three years. I value that clarity - and appreciate your discussion of how the trinity functions as a model for the church. (Very Moltmannian, btw, MP.)

Of course, as a good unitarian, I remain unconvinced... but I can appreciate a well-written sermon!

Grandmère Mimi said...

Belief is communal, it is not an individual act, you cannot be a Christian in isolation, that would be a contradiction in terms, because so much of our faith is concerned with being a community, with loving each other, with loving God, of being part of the vine of faith, with each of us offering our individual and distinctive gifts to each other and to God. Working together as the community of the Kingdom of God.

And that's why I don't walk away. That's why I hang in.

I fear that I'm going to bring your wrath down upon me, MadPriest, but should the words be "vice versa"? OCICBW.

MadPriest said...

Ah, ES. But I did state in the sermon that the doctrine of the Trinity is a good model, not that the Trinity is a good model. Therefore, the paradigm can be used by anyone looking for a way into discussing unity.

To be honest, although I'm not a Unitarian, I am definitely a "sort of" monophysite, and I would not exclude anyone from the definition "Christian" if they wanted to be called Christian, just because they didn't believe in the Trinity.

John-Julian, OJN said...

I remember the wise rector who raised me from the age of 4 until ordination saying: "There is only one thing a Christian can do absolutely alone -- and that is to be damned!"

Of course, that was about 60 years ago...and although the principle is solid I'd want to talk a bit about the "damned" thing.

JCF said...

Sir: I hearby withdraw ALL my previous compliments to your PhotoShopping skills.

DOG IS NOT MOCKED!!!

Pluralist (Adrian Worsfold) said...

Surely the Trinitarian dog should have one head, and six hind legs (etc.). Drinking lemonade makes me a monofizzite.

FranIAm said...

Oh dear, you have my heart now.

This is wonderful.

That said, I am fairly certain I will be annoyed with you soon enough.

But for now- I can only say your words show much wisdom.

David |däˈvēd| said...

I am fairly certain I will be annoyed with you soon enough.

Frani, you can take that to the bank.

KJ said...

Amen (In response to the sermon, and I suppose to Fran's anticipated annoyance as well.)!

MadPriest said...

It appears that I am now getting into trouble for things I might do sometime in the future - and I'm not even a Roman Catholic.

Muthah+ said...

My my Maddie, you are so much more orthodox that I would have ever guessed!

MadPriest said...

I have told you people over and over that I'm 100% credally orthodox. I just don't care if anybody else is.

pax58 said...

MP,
If I were still preaching, I would steal this from you. The best reflection I have read. Good thinking on your part. Can I send it to my victor and tell him to read it instead of what he was going to say?

Tim Lusk
Tucson, AZ USA

Anonymous said...

Excellent sermon, MP. Marilyn

Kenny said...

Sh***! After telling some of my lot today to log in and read your sermon, here I am on Saturday night wishing I could use it, as mine of course. After a few Trinity Sundays, you kind of run out of stuff that's not going to bore folk rigid. I loved Rloand Walls' tale of him trying to teach what the Trinity was all about to a Sunday School in Millport. Eventually, this wee boy put up his hand and said, "Fr Roland, does that mean that God is three people who love each other so much they're actually only one person?" Roland was tickled pink and used to laugh uproriously when he retold the story!

Boaz said...

Yes enjoyed this sermon. We had one at Church today which was good, but not as good as this one.

Raspberry Rabbit said...

I seriously dislike preaching on Trinity Sunday. Not because I'm feel impelled to hold forth on things I don't believe but simply because there's been so little said about the subject in this particular parish that you feel you have to start from square one - at least with those under 40 in the congregation. Thanks for this sermon. I've stolen a couple of bits. I didn't think you'd mind.

R

Adam Pastor said...

Greetings Jonathan

On the subject of the trinity,
I recommend this video:
The Human Jesus

Take a couple of hours to watch it; and prayerfully it will aid you to reconsider "The Trinity"

Incidentally, your photo of
DOG in three persons. A canine
trinity;

is to all intents and purposes, identical to the mythological Cerberus
which the following two illustrious men mentioned when speaking of the trinity:

1) Michael Servetus wrote to John Calvin,
"Instead of God, you have a Cerberus of three heads: the Trinity."

2) Thomas Jefferson, Letter to James Smith:
"Nor was the unity of the Supreme Being ousted from the Christian creed by the force of reason, but by the sword of civil government, wielded at the will of the fanatic Athanasius. The hocus-pocus phantasm of a God like another Cerberus, with one body and three heads, had its birth and growth in the blood of thousands and thousands of martyrs."

Food for thought!

Yours In Messiah
Adam Pastor