Quite a lot of the images we're likely to remember from the footage of the riots in the summer will be of young people out of control in the streets, walking off with looted property from shops, noisily confronting police and so on. It all feeds into the national habit of being suspicious and hostile when we see groups of youngsters on street corners or outside shops and bus shelters. We walk a bit more quickly and hope we can pass without some sort of confrontation.
The events of the summer were certainly horrific. They showed us a face of our society we don't like to think about – angry, destructive, lawless. But it's crucial to remember that what we saw on the streets in August was just one facet of a bigger and much more heartbreaking problem. The youngsters out on the streets may have looked like a big crowd, but they are a minority of their generation – the minority whose way of dealing with their frustrations was by way of random destructiveness and irresponsibility. Most people of their own age strongly shared the general feeling of dismay at this behaviour.
I've come to visit the charity Kids Company in London where today a lot of young people are joining together to pack food parcels for needy families in the neighbourhood. When you have a chance of talking to young people like this you really get a sense of how they feel about the society they're in and the challenges they face.
We have to ask, what kind of society is it that lets down so many of its young people? That doesn't provide enough good role models and drives youngsters further into unhappiness and anxiety by only showing them suspicion and negativity. When you see the gifts they can offer, the energy that can be released when they feel safe and loved, you see what a tragedy we so often allow to happen. Look at the work done by groups like the Children's Society or by the astonishing network of Kids Company here in London, and you see what can be done to wake up that energy and let it flourish for everyone's good.
One of the unique things in the Christian faith, one of its great contributions to our moral vision, is the way it has spoken about children and young people. Whether it's Jesus blessing children, or St Paul encouraging a young church leader, saying, 'Don't let people look down on you because you're young', or St Benedict in his rule for monks saying that you need to pay attention to the youngest as well as the oldest – Christian faith has underlined the essential importance of giving young people the respect they deserve.
Of course they're not infallible; of course they have a lot to learn. So do we all. But being grown-up doesn't mean forgetting about the young. And a good New Year's Resolution might be to think what you can do locally to support facilities for young people, to support opportunities for counselling and learning and enjoyment in a safe environment. And above all, perhaps we should just be asking how we make friends with our younger fellow citizens – for the sake of our happiness as well as theirs. A very happy and blessed New Year to you all.
Yes. But.
The problem is that what Rowan Williams sincerely suggests (suggestions that have come out of the mouths of canvassing politicians many, many times in the past) is just treating the symptoms, not curing the illness. Respecting, encouraging and keeping occupied young people who are either unemployed or taken advantage of by employers, who have no money and, therefore, no dignity or hope for a "traditional" future, is no more effective in the long run as sucking a cough sweet when you are suffering from bronchitis.
Children and young adults are primarily influenced by three factors: family, peers and society and the greatest of these is society for the simple reason that society influences their families and peers as well as being a direct influence - the influence of society on a young person is a triple whammy.
There have always been, and will always be, good and bad parents with most parents aspiring to an acceptable average. Rich kids, sent off to boarding school and looked after by nannies, are just as abused as latch key poor kids. Working parents with little cash can be much better parents than a Hooray Henry who even farms out his sons and heirs during the school holidays. And, conversely, many rich parents do a better job of raising their spoiled brats than crackhead single moms and absent fathers.
Young people are always influenced by friends and youth culture. Although a caring family background where morality is well defined usually enables a young person to avoid going completely off the rails, there will always be children of the most loving, responsible parents who end up as junkies.
However, bad parents and the wrong sort of friends will always be the exception to the general rule if society doesn't work against the common decency which is inherent in the vast majority of us. And, yes, it is inherent as recent experiments involving toddlers have proved. We are born knowing the difference between right and wrong. Unfortunately we are also born with a tendency for self-interest and, so, growing up is about learning to balance these two human traits.
The shit hits the fan when society becomes either predominantly immoral or amoral. We are all part of society. We are all influenced by it and we all contribute to its current nature. But some people have more influence than others. England became the sociopathic society it is today because of one person, Margaret Thatcher. Backed by her army of bobbies and her yes ma'am, poodle cabinet, she spouted out her Darwinian venom from 10 Downing Street, preaching dog eat dog, survival of the fittest, amoralism in a bid to turn Britain into Little America but without opportunity for all. She laid the rotten egg that was to give birth to the boom and bust, bail out the bankers, economy that is taking us all to hell in a handcart right now. Worst of all she gave employers permission to stop treating their workers as people and, instead, view them in the same way they would view a disposable asset. She changed the employment laws to make this possible. It was at this point that England stopped being a Christian country and became a machine without morality. Ironically, it was the young who jumped on her bandwagon from hell. The tragedy is that it is now the young who have no hope because of Thatcher's destruction of society.
Thatcher got rid of the concept of job security, a job for life, that had been part of English self-mythology for much of the Twentieth Century. This created an underclass of long term unemployed, poor people, many of whom did anything legal and illegal to stay alive or found temporary relief in promiscuous sex, drugs and drink. And these people started treating each other in the way employers treated them, as expendable. Couples split up as quickly and easily as companies downsized and sold off assets. There is no moral compass in England today because Thatcher brought her jackboots down on it and smashed it to smithereens.
It is the children and grandchildren of the working people Thatcher screwed who rioted in our streets last year. They are the young people joining gangs and killing each other. They are the drug takers and drug pushers. They are the thieves steeling lead of church roofs and mugging each other for cell phones. And why shouldn't they? We live now in a post-Thatcherism cesspit of of personal greed fed by new-atheists telling us that we are machines programmed with selfish genes. These young people have seen first hand that there is absolutely no point in being part of society because, as Thatcher said, there is now no such thing as society. There is no point saving for the future because when they throw you on the scrapheap the first thing they take off you is your savings. You might as well spend every penny you earn as soon as it hits your bank account and enjoy yourself now so at least you have some happy memories to look back on when you are queuing up outside the job-centre waiting for some patronising git of a civil servant to quiz you about how hard you looked for a job in the passed week.
No, respecting the young is not good enough. If we do not start respecting their parents and grandparents; if we don't start providing security of employment and decent wages for working people, if we don't stop rewarding the parasites and start rewarding the people whose sweat fuels the economy, then young people will just laugh in our faces because they are not stupid and they can see from what happened to their parents that there is no such thing as respect in our society anymore and no God-bothering, over-privileged schoolteacher, who would stab his best friend in the back and who obviously disrespects the whatever percent of our population who were born gay, is going to persuade them otherwise.
Oh, happy new year, by the way.
Happy New Year. I think you nailed it.
ReplyDeleteFWIW
jimB
Wow. This is very, very, very good.
ReplyDeleteAnd here, I think, is the most important thing you said:
"Thatcher got rid of the concept of job security, a job for life, that had been part of English self-mythology for much of the Twentieth Century. This created an underclass of long term unemployed, poor people, many of whom did anything legal and illegal to stay alive or found temporary relief in promiscuous sex, drugs and drink. And these people started treating each other in the way employers treated them, as expendable."
We built an economic system based on sin. Then we fully remodeled our social system to conform to that economic system. What were they expecting, anyway?
ReplyDeleteBloody brilliant. And depressing.
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year.
Thanks, Lisa. You goths seem to have maintained a moral underpinning albeit in your own crazy way. I guess that is because you have created a strong sense of community among each other.
ReplyDeleteYour last paragraph FTMFW!
ReplyDeleteHappy New Year from Football*-Orgy Land...
* The Real Football, where you carry and throw a...well, football-shaped ball (pointed on each end, as God intended)
Just now listened to the song.
ReplyDeleteWOW!
There are consequences in downsizing quite apart from increasing the share price and performance bonuses for upper management.
ReplyDeleteWhen companies are downsized, restructured, and the "fat" cut away, society (that is, all of us) have something cut away from us I terms of the fabric of society. There is perhaps nothing more damaging to the self esteem if a young person than to see their parent emasculated socially. And for what? To increase the economic return, for who? We are all owners of these companies these days through the mutual finds who mange our retirement contributions. So it should be able to be stopped.
The “opportunity for all” was already being taken away from the average American at about the same time Mrs. Thatcher was reeking havoc in the U.K. When Reagan broke the unions he broke some fundamental feeling of fair play that all of us had. The deck began to be stacked against the working people. We went into a seemingly endless cycle of acquisitions and mergers, the point of which seemed to be to dismantle businesses with the jobs they provided and sell off all the assets to create more money for an already monied class. The country’s wealth was ever being pushed upward. The problem with that is that 1-2% cannot indefinitely suppress the 98-99% without having the have-nots push back. It foments rebellion. The reason our democracy has held together for as long as it has is that we had a thriving middle class. That is now all but gone. I believe we are in for a rough few years unless these issues are resolved quickly. I am not holding my breath, however, that the super rich, including a great many people in our Congress and judicial systems, will get the message in time. Great goodness, this is too pessimistic for words. And a Happy New Year to you too, M.P.
ReplyDeleteThere are companies that do share the profits with the employees and others that are owned by the employees. Interestingly, there are usually very long waiting lists even to apply for jobs at these places because there is no turnover. You'd think that might start some people in power to thinking, but it hasn't. I guess they're afraid that of they advocate the workers owning the company or sharing in the profits, people will call them communists. Of course, they'd be right, but it seems to me that communistic capitalism might not be such a bad way to go. Couldn't be any worse.
ReplyDeleteBoocat is right, and time is running very short indeed. The latest economic forecasts are predicting a slow recovery with little job expansion; full employment will not arrive in the US until 2020..... The situation in Europe will probably deteriorate further as the austerity forced on in-trouble nations strangles their attempts at economic recovery - basically there is no way out for Europe in going down the austerity path - it is almost guaranteed to end in one or more sovereign defaults, and no one knows where that will end up.
ReplyDeleteAs I still maintain, capitalism is a relentless enemy of the Gospel. You cannot be a good Christian and a good capitalist.
ReplyDeleteAmen to Mad Priest and to Mark Brunson just above. Go to keep denouncing what the selfish have wrought -- and trying to exemplify something better. We've got work to do.
ReplyDeleteCall me primitive (although actually I'm very sophisticated), but I really don't think that an ex-divine, hoping to be reinstated divine, should be using words like 'fuck' and 'shit' in public discourse. People who do so have generally little to say and attempt to inflate their thoughts by obscenity. If you really want to be reinstated - and that's the question - do you really? - you have to raise your game.
ReplyDeleteExcuse me, Anonymous, but did you listen to the song? If you did, then you'll know MadPriest is quoting.
ReplyDeleteMay I suggest that you raise YOUR game by having the simple good manners to sign your comment? People who post anonymously really do come across as cowardly.
Patronising, cowardly twat.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, as I posted a couple of months ago, I am not seeking to be reinstated. I am happy doing what I do and being who I am and part of who I am is that I utter profanities when they help me say what I want to say. It's my culture and I I'm not changing to fit in with somebody else's culture that has nothing to do with me.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous,
ReplyDeleteIf sophisticated means evil, cowardly, deceitful, conniving . . .
. . then yes, you are.
I'm not.
Fuck yourself, eat shit, die.
Have a nice day, asshole.
And, before the inevitable whinging starts:
ReplyDeleteNo, I'm not a good Christian (probably, though Jesus didn't give any exhortations about swearing or being on your manners), but still a Christian, which a committed capitalist cannot be.
Ellie,
ReplyDeleteRead it. He isn't merely quoting.
MadPriest, you are very offensive as well as grossly self-indulgent.
MarkBrunson, you are grossly offensive.
Bye,
John Moles.